 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| l |
OSS is more
secure and network-ready
|
|
|
l |
Usually it
is: e.g., defensively
designed Linux
|
|
|
l |
Users don't have
open access to code elements needed to spread
|
|
|
malware
|
|
|
l |
Proprietary
software can be as secure, but fewer developers means
|
|
fewer reviews
|
|
| l |
OSS can be
customized
|
|
| l |
OSS is better
because it's transparent
|
|
| l |
OSS is better
because it uses open standards
|
|
|
l |
So can
proprietary software
|
|
| l |
OSS is by and
for a community
|
|
| l |
Experimenting
with OSS is expensive
|
|
|
l |
Not meeting your
goals is more expensive
|
|