Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Pedagogical uses of CONTENTdm in the liberal arts
  • Scott E. Siddall
  • Denison University


  • This presentation is accessible at
  •   http://siddall.info/talks/
2
Two projects
  • REALIA project
  • http://realiaproject.org
3
Basic selection criteria
  • Software and workflow approaches
    • Proprietary, homegrown, open source, partnerships
    • Centralized versus desktop


  • Requirements
    • Metadata flexibility
    • Avoid vendor lock-in – exportable data
    • Distributed management with approval queue
    • Open standards
    • Support and continued R & D
4
Example: detailed software criteria
  • Allows collaborative and distributed collection development/management
  • Platform (hardware, operating system) agnostic – server and client
  • Web-based client with easy-to-use interface
  • Basic and advanced searching across collections, across sites (federated searches, virtual collections, stored result sets)
  • Common client-side players/viewers
  • Client tools for manipulation, comparison, per-user annotation
  • Flexible support for metadata standards
  • Support for many object formats, and developing formats (e.g., jpeg 2000)
  • Support for high-resolution, zoom-in features
  • Supports Unicode text for display and searching
  • URL access to objects
  • Customizable display interface
  • Based on open standards (database, metadata, etc.)
  • Flexible access control list features
  • Standards-based export functions to avoid “lock-in” and promote remote indexing
5
CONTENTdm
web-based presentation
6
CONTENTdm
web-based administration
7
CONTENTdm export functions
  • Thumbnail, service and full resolution images stored in directories in standard image formats
8
CONTENTdm export functions
  • Metadata exporting
9
CONTENTdm metadata flexibility
  • Metadata is expensive
  • Time required for content specialists to create and proof key fields of metadata
  • Balancing metadata quality with results
    • Risks of not finding materials
    • Risks of “dirty” results
    • Perfect can be the enemy of good
10
Indexing binary content (images)?
11
Metadata is expensive
12
CONTENTdm support
  • Distributed and supported by OCLC
  • Predictable costs
  • Continued development
    • JPEG2000
    • PowerPoint plug-in
    • Community open source developments
13
CONTENTdm and open source
  • Proprietary software + open standards has led to an open source community


    • Controlled vocabulary analyzer
    • Importable Library of Congress Subject Headings
    • E-commerce extension for ordering images
    • RSS feed generator to subscribe to collections
    • Direct linking to objects
    • XML Gateway for federated searching of CONTENTdm collections
    • Feedback tool for commenting/reviewing objects
    • OASIS – a web-based tool for organizing and importing images
14
Solicit feedback on images
  • On a “per image” basis
  • Insectary:
    • links to blogs for each image
  • REALIA:
    • feedback data sent via email to collection administrators

15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Alternative to Acquisition Station
  • Midwest Instructional Technology Center
  • Associated Colleges of the South Technology Center
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
CONTENTdm OAI harvesting
23
CONTENTdm Multi-Site Server
24
Adopted by colleagues
25
"Return to home"
  • Return to home