|
1
|
- Scott E. Siddall
- Denison University
|
|
2
|
- Gain first-hand experience
- Involve faculty and students
- Compare with commercial offerings and unbundled information services
|
|
3
|
- Sun LX50 running Solaris 5.8
- Apache, Java 1.3, Tomcat 3, Oracle 9i
- CourseWork release 2.1
- Linked to phpBB for discussion
|
|
4
|
- English
- Political Science
- Modern Language
- One 16-week semester
|
|
5
|
- Support
- Two 1-hr training session with faculty
- One 30 minute in-class presentation
- 6 hrs spent in system administration in 16 weeks
- Faculty perspective
- Students aren’t well prepared to use CMS
- Much content is not “CMS ready”
- What is the value of integrating information services?
- Student perspective
- CourseWork was “transparent”
- See also a presentation at CLAC conference
|
|
6
|
- Provide immediate, first-hand experience for experiments and courses
- Installation, hosting and support by
- The Longsight Group
(http://longsight.com)
|
|
7
|
- One Dell PowerEdge 2650, dual processor, 4 Gb memory, 216 Gb RAID
- RedHat Linux 9
- Apache 2, Java 1.4, Tomcat 4, PostreSQL
- CourseWork 2.5; CHEF 1.1.09
- For both: load problems with connector between Apache and Tomcat
- Mod_j2k connector
- couple of bugs logged with Apache project
- went with an Apache Reverse Proxy instead
|
|
8
|
- Stanford look and feel
- Uses pictures of pillars and Stanford colors
- Not easy to edit: graphics
coalesced
- Used the Cambridge layout instead
- Cambridge port vs. Stanford code
- Cambridge port included hacks to handle PostgreSQL and Oracle
- About 10-12 bugs that we fixed
- no centralized location to handle bugs, fixes, and patches
- Sourceforge code managed by Cambridge
- No discussion board software
- No easy way to integrate with 3rd-party discussion tools
- CourseWork creates obtuse passwords (random negative integers)
- We created Java classes that create "speakable" passwords
using only letters
- Easier to remember
- CourseWork has no mechanism to send a user a forgotten password
- We created custom Java code to send a user a lost password
- We also created custom PHP code that super-users could use to view all
user accounts/emails/passwords
|
|
9
|
- Cambridge port vs. Stanford code
- Needed to re-integrate PostgreSQL functionality back into new Stanford
code
- CourseWork 3.0 is not database-independent like many open-source
projects
- Needed to reintegrate all custom Longsight fixes/features from
CourseWork 2.5
- Cambridge release of CourseWork 2.x includes features in Cocoon
- Created our own source repository of clean, PostgreSQL-compatable
CourseWork 3.0
- No place to report bugs back to Stanford (Bugzilla)
|
|
10
|
- Stores elements in the database using XML
- additional level of complexity to debug/add functionality to
- New terminology
- realms, sites, workspaces
- Student self-registration didn’t match small college faculty
expectations
- Passwords are not accessible to system administrator but can be reset
- CourseTools NG contains some U of Michigan-specific elements
- Look and feel is relatively hard to edit
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- Support
- One three-hour training session for campus support staff
- Online email helpdesk – 24 hr response time
- Faculty perspective
- Enthusiastic and successful without prior CMS experience; want to
continue in Fall ‘04
- Want more options for assessment
- Most drawn to CHEF for discussion and interaction
- Drawn to CourseWork for its interface structure and repository
- Student perspective
- Once again – transparent and successful
|
|
18
|
- Some feature limitations, such as:
- Ungraded assignments
- Multiple correct responses in multiple choice questions
- Longer interval for timed activities
- More categories of copyright status (i.e., TBD)
- Sought after assessment tools
|
|
19
|
- Very few system issues with these open source applications
- User problems resolved in 1-24 hrs
- Relatively low training requirements
- Basic CMS tools meet high percentage of needs
|
|
20
|
- OFIC Open Source CMS Pilot Program continues in fall semester
- Pedagogically-designed features from small colleges
- Sakai Assessment Manager
- Combination of Indiana’s Navigo and Stanford’s Assignment &
Assessment Manager
- Sakai Project
|
|
21
|
|