|
1
|
- Scott Siddall
- siddall@denison.edu
|
|
2
|
- Why are we talking about repositories?
- Who’s in charge?
|
|
3
|
- “…a university-based institutional repository is a set of services that
a university offers to the members of its community for the management
and dissemination of digital materials created by the institution and
its community members. It is most essentially an organizational
commitment to the stewardship of these digital materials, including
long-term preservation where appropriate, as well as organization and
access or distribution." (Lynch, 2003)
|
|
4
|
- Our responsibility as stewards of IP
- Credit and recognition
- Showcase scholarship for recruitment
- Pressures of the open access movement
- Ensure our work products as legacies
- Communicate our research and creativity
- Publish our research and creativity
- Document our processes
|
|
5
|
- Institutional
- Personal
- Consortial
- Disciplinary
- Research
- Emeriti
- Curricular
- Etc., etc., etc.
|
|
6
|
- articles
- books and theses
- primary data and
- associated files
- video, music and rich media
- course materials
- Any digital content: blobs
|
|
7
|
- Faculty
- Preprints, postprints
- Data
- Curricular materials
- Research reports
- Students
- Staff
- Special collections
- Institutional data
- Minutes
- Emeriti
- And more….
|
|
8
|
- Ownership vs leadership
- Control
- Funding
|
|
9
|
- Purpose of the repository
- Alignment with mission
- Uncertainty about intellectual property issues
- Faculty incentives to contribute;
scholarly credit
- Selection of unique content
- Need for collaborative planning
- Commitment to archiving and preservation
- Costs and quality of metadata
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- DSpace
- Eprints
- Fedora
- Local software projects
|
|
12
|
- Web ‘sites’ have become applications
- Information services that can be mashed
- Distributed content and management
- Interactive user interfaces
- Open access
|
|
13
|
- Britannica Online --> Wikipedia
- Personal websites --> blogging
- Screen scraping, batch uploads --> web services
- Publishing --> participation
- Content management systems --> wikis
- Directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy")
- Stickiness --> syndication
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Federated searches across many collections
- Harvesting collections (OAI) or even the desktop (P2P)
- Combining content from local and remote collections
- Integrating content into CMS
|
|
25
|
- Another reason to collaborate
- Within the institution – library, faculty, technology
- Beyond the institution – open source, community source
- DSpace and Fedora Commons following the Sakai Foundation model
|
|
26
|
- Repository Project Planning
- Goals
- Resources
- Processes
- Challenges
|
|
27
|
- Is there a unifying goal for the project, or multiple goals?
- What are the relative proportions of institutional vs faculty
collections?
- Conservatively, what percentage of the faculty collections are unique,
legally sharable?
- What role might student scholarship and creative work play?
- What other institutional records might be catalogued?
- How can/should the collection be shared (policies in addition to
technologies)?
|
|
28
|
- What digital collections do you have now and how complete are they?
- Are there capital and human resources to support an IR?
- What facilities (scanning, software, storage, backup and bandwidth) are
available?
- What might be the role of outsourcing in the project (hosting,
digitization)?
- How will you avoid vendor or technology “lock-in”
- Are there any donors or corporate connections on the horizon?
|
|
29
|
- Is your academic leadership committed to supporting this effort?
- What are the possibilities for collaboration?
- What role might students in the majors have in initial metadata
creation?
- Are there regional repositories for specialized collections? Do they
share metadata schema?
- What are the possibilities for federated searching and OAI harvesting?
|
|
30
|
- What are the real and perceived barriers to the project?
- What are/might be the incentives for faculty to contribute?
- How will projects be prioritized for inclusion?
- What level of quality can you afford?
- Is there a campus policy on intellectual property that favors this
project?
- How will the faculty (or institutional) collections be maintained?
|
|
31
|
|